Whether it’s pure force, the use of weapons or this super-secret spy strategy, all these have one thing in common: Vladimir Putin.
However, Putin’s biggest power is its political influence: he led Russia with an iron fist, crushing all kinds of political opposition, and was recently accused of involvement in the presidential election in the United States.
But how did Putin ended up from a poor kid born in St. Petersburg to becoming the symbol of modern Russia?
Vladimir Putin was born in 1952, his father being a master in a St. Petersburg factory and his mother a housewife.
During his childhood, Putin was involved in numerous conflicts with his colleagues, a moral feature that paved the way for his passion for judo.
After graduating from Leningrad State University, Putin became a KGB secret agent in 1975.
He spent 16 years there, and in 1990, when he returned to Russia, he began his political career.
He first worked as a civil servant in St. Petersburg City Hall, and his good results drew the attention of the councilors of Boris Iletin. After three years in Moscow, Putin was appointed Prime Minister of Russia in 1999.
A tragic event would define its political trajectory: the attacks in Russia in September 1999, that caused the death of 200, when Putin demonstrated his leadership skills. He accused the Chechen separatists of organizing the attacks and led a real campaign against them.
Therefore, after Ielin’s resignation in 2000, Putin became the new president of Russia.
Vladimir Putin was now in charge of the state, but he still did not have enough power to change things as he wanted to. His first move was to discuss with the richest people in Russia, the oligarchs, and to offer them two options: either to support the Putin regime or to go to jail.
Putin’s strategy has always been simple: restoring global influence and maintaining the former Soviet Union in its sphere of influence.
Vladimir Putin is in the last year of his mandate, but there are chances that he will run again and remain head of state until 2024.
Without news and economic announcements, the FOREX market would be an apathetic place
In fact, any stock market would exist for nothing if there were no news, financial results or any other events meant to change the bearish or bullish trends of the balance of supply and demand.
As a trader, I do not care very much to understand this news in depth.
However, I am very attentive to how the market reacts to these ads.
The way the market “reacts” to a certain event can provide the necessary clues related to our next move.
Reading the Market Trends Based on FOREX News
Being able to determine the trends is very important if you want to become a profitable long-term trader.
In fact, all Price Action or geometric formations experts use in trading are a way of reading the stock market’s trend. Obviously, when you understand and interpret them correctly and not mechanically, things might start looking up for you.
Let’s suppose we have an upward trend for GBP/USD and obviously, we want to buy in order to benefit from this trend or we have a buying position already open and we want to pyramid correctly by adding to that position.
Following the reaction of a currency after the news is being released from the UK, you can see the market trends in the GBP/USD area (keep in mind that you are interested only in the news marked with red).
If a market is on an upward trend and this negative or neutral news appears on the market, and yet the market is still rising, it means that buyers ignore this news and continue to maintain their position.
Moreover, new buyers enter the market, a factor that leads to the increase of the price even more.
Conversely, if a market is on a downward trend and positive news fails to reverse this trend means that vendors took over control.
Apple, Alphabet, and Microsoft are just three of the most appreciated American companies that have become a force in the global bond market, pumping billions of dollars into the national budget and corporate titles.
No less than 30 different American companies share investments worth $00 billion dollars in fixed income tools, suggests an analysis created by Financial Times.
Their holdings transform these names into a real force when it comes to debt markets, in comparison to top asset managers like AllianceBernstein, Invesco or Franklin Templeton.
“They are real asset managers,” revealed Ramaswamy Variankaval from JPMorgan about these companies.
Against the reluctance of US multinationals to repatriate their earnings abroad, the level of US-owned liquidity has risen to more than $2 billion, with 50% more than in the last decade and twice the levels reached at the beginning of the century, according to the data released by the US Central Bank.
In total, those 30 companies, including Ford, Coca-Cola, and Boeing, hold more than $1.200 billion dollars of liquidity, according to FT analysis.
Apple will use these funds to finance the capital program for their shareholders as well as for general expenses.
The US company has a $96.6 billion exposure to senior unsecured bonds and $12 billion in unsecured short-term bonds, according to July 1 data.
Apple has so far issued bonds in dollars, pounds, euros, and yen. Almost two months ago, Tesla sold $1.8 billion in bonds for eight years. On Tuesday, Amazon.com issued $ 16 billion in bonds to finance the acquisition of the Whole Foods Market for $ 13.7 billion.